Comment 8 for bug 1358835

Revision history for this message
bugproxy (bugproxy) wrote : Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

------- Comment From <email address hidden> 2014-11-18 19:13 EDT-------
Hi,

Are you sure the fix is in the new libnuma.so.1?

I copied it to our node and re-tested it. I didn't see any difference. The test still failed.

root@c656f2n01:/usr/lib/powerpc64le-linux-gnu# sum libnuma.so.1 libnuma.so.1.orig
63898 51 libnuma.so.1 <---------- the fix libnuma.so.1
12964 51 libnuma.so.1.orig <----------- the original libnuma.so.1