Comment 22 for bug 604283

Yes, I'd say that "wontfix" is appropriate unless someone comes forward with a reason why ntpd *should* listen at 127.0.1.1.

P.S. I earlier wrote the following.

> It appears that bind9 operates in the same way.
> I added a virtual interface eth0:0 with a bogus address
> and named started listening on that without being
> restarted.

I later discovered that this occurs because bind9 has a hook script in /etc/network/if-up.d/ which does "rndc reconfig".