I'll combine the approach in the former with what I have prepared for my report to Debian.
Packaging for the binary packages might follow the naming that Fedora uses.
Once/If I have something that works fine I'd open up an MP for Ubuntu to let people comment on it.
I'll take a look at that after getting some other (unrelated) blockers out of the way.
It seems this has some (non encouraging) history: /bugs.debian. org/cgi- bin/bugreport. cgi?bug= 855879 /bugs.debian. org/cgi- bin/bugreport. cgi?bug= 732201
https:/
https:/
I'll combine the approach in the former with what I have prepared for my report to Debian.
Packaging for the binary packages might follow the naming that Fedora uses.
Once/If I have something that works fine I'd open up an MP for Ubuntu to let people comment on it.
I'll take a look at that after getting some other (unrelated) blockers out of the way.