(In reply to comment #56)
> (In reply to comment #51)
> > But that could probably be a topic of another bug, after this is checked in?
>
> The current patch should at least not add actions when the server doesn't
> announce "actions" capability. That would also be in line with comment 25.
I'd rather do this than fallback to XUL, this bug seems like a giant waste if the most popular distribution doesn't benefit from it in any way.
(In reply to comment #56)
> (In reply to comment #51)
> > But that could probably be a topic of another bug, after this is checked in?
>
> The current patch should at least not add actions when the server doesn't
> announce "actions" capability. That would also be in line with comment 25.
I'd rather do this than fallback to XUL, this bug seems like a giant waste if the most popular distribution doesn't benefit from it in any way.