Comment 257 for bug 390508

Eddie Dunn (eddie-dunn) wrote :

I've read the comments defending the position that the -t parameter should be ignored. I still don't understand. I'm dumbfounded.

I can honestly see no harm whatsoever in adding support for it.

There are plenty of use cases for which the default time out does not work well at all. The current implementation violates the spec. Why are you so stubborn?