I've noticed that the notify-osd memory usage is reduced to 4.8 mbs
recently on my box (regularly updated).
I'd guess that recent changes partially, if not fully, contribute to
this reduction. So thank you for the continuous progress.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 19:36, Cody Russell <email address hidden> wrote:
> So I'm working on moving my pixbuf scaling code into notify-osd, and I
> noticed in bubble.c bubble_set_icon_from_pixbuf() doesn't appear to
> unref pixbufs under all conditions, and it seems very likely that we're
> leaking pixbufs here.
>
> I'm not sure how useful it is to apply this patch since I'm planning to
> change this code to preserve the aspect ratio when scaling pixbufs. But
> here it is anyway.
>
> ** Attachment added: "leaky-pixbufs.diff"
> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24536051/leaky-pixbufs.diff
>
> --
> notify-osd heavy memory usage
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/334141
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
Gentlements,
I've noticed that the notify-osd memory usage is reduced to 4.8 mbs
recently on my box (regularly updated).
I'd guess that recent changes partially, if not fully, contribute to
this reduction. So thank you for the continuous progress.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 19:36, Cody Russell <email address hidden> wrote: set_icon_ from_pixbuf( ) doesn't appear to pixbufs. diff" launchpadlibrar ian.net/ 24536051/ leaky-pixbufs. diff /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 334141
> So I'm working on moving my pixbuf scaling code into notify-osd, and I
> noticed in bubble.c bubble_
> unref pixbufs under all conditions, and it seems very likely that we're
> leaking pixbufs here.
>
> I'm not sure how useful it is to apply this patch since I'm planning to
> change this code to preserve the aspect ratio when scaling pixbufs. But
> here it is anyway.
>
> ** Attachment added: "leaky-
> http://
>
> --
> notify-osd heavy memory usage
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>