On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Steve Langasek <
<email address hidden>> wrote:
> > BTW, this is likely a 64-bit problem, as that number is -2, right? Maybe
> > it's an exceptionally bad programming error. I guess I won't see this
> > problem on i386.
>
> Incorrect.
>
>
Have you tested it on amd64?
I'll take a look at the config if it can indeed be solved by trivial
configuration. IIRC, on the machine I tested, I did check the proposed flags
and they were correct. I didn't even touch them.
Hi Steve,
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Steve Langasek <
<email address hidden>> wrote:
> > BTW, this is likely a 64-bit problem, as that number is -2, right? Maybe
> > it's an exceptionally bad programming error. I guess I won't see this
> > problem on i386.
>
> Incorrect.
>
>
Have you tested it on amd64?
I'll take a look at the config if it can indeed be solved by trivial
configuration. IIRC, on the machine I tested, I did check the proposed flags
and they were correct. I didn't even touch them.
Cheers,
-- groups. yahoo.com/ group/ai- philosophy myspace. com/arizanesil http:// myspace. com/malfunct
Eray Ozkural, PhD candidate. Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
http://
http://