I think the suggested fix in comment #8 is absolutely evil. The intentions are well-placed but the results of using that work-around are evil and I believe lead to the sort of issues reported in bug #543506. I still have to go to a few more machines and "undo" that change to be completely sure. I will update when I have done more testing.
I think the suggested fix in comment #8 is absolutely evil. The intentions are well-placed but the results of using that work-around are evil and I believe lead to the sort of issues reported in bug #543506. I still have to go to a few more machines and "undo" that change to be completely sure. I will update when I have done more testing.