Comment 19 for bug 1509120
Revision history for this message
| bugproxy (bugproxy) wrote Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla | #19 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
------- Comment From <email address hidden> 2015-11-03 20:56 EDT-------
Thanks for chasing down the missing dependency side of the equation here.
That still leaves the potential of deadlock if the callout exec ever returns non-zero for any other reason. Are the risks considered low enough to simply document this as a potential hazard of writing process accounting information across an NFSv4 mount?