> Arch solved this problem by packaging gssproxy and making nfs-utils depend on it. That's not a correct fix for a message about an *optional* service that is absent from the system.
Agreed.
However, having gssproxy in Debian/Ubuntu would a good thing, see:
> Arch solved this problem by packaging gssproxy and making nfs-utils depend on it. That's not a correct fix for a message about an *optional* service that is absent from the system.
Agreed.
However, having gssproxy in Debian/Ubuntu would a good thing, see:
https:/ /fedoraproject. org/wiki/ Features/ gss-proxy
I will file a RTP...
> Not everything in the logs is an error message. I think it's clear from context that this is a warning, not an error.
Perhaps systemd needs to make a clearer distinction between info, warning, notice, error, ...