Same problem with correct mapping for file listings but denied write access here in hardy, after avoiding bug #235930, which by the way might be useful for people who get "nobody,nogroup" mappings.
Running "rpc.idmapd -fvvv" on both machines showed me that id mapping was done from server numeric ids to names to client numeric ids, but apparently not the other way round. I haven't understood nfs4 enough to judge whether or not this is expected behaviour. I guess I'd need to read more of rfc 3530, as I can't fathom yet where in my wiresharked network traffic all this user authentication is supposed to happen.
Same problem with correct mapping for file listings but denied write access here in hardy, after avoiding bug #235930, which by the way might be useful for people who get "nobody,nogroup" mappings.
Running "rpc.idmapd -fvvv" on both machines showed me that id mapping was done from server numeric ids to names to client numeric ids, but apparently not the other way round. I haven't understood nfs4 enough to judge whether or not this is expected behaviour. I guess I'd need to read more of rfc 3530, as I can't fathom yet where in my wiresharked network traffic all this user authentication is supposed to happen.