On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 11:21:41PM -0000, Andrew Jorgensen wrote:
[...]
> Also this may be the last case where they weren't stored in the keyring,
> in which case the motivation to write a new infrastructure to prevent it
> goes away.
Can't say I'm a fan of that line of thought. Maybe this should be
reported as a separate security-related bug? - If it isn't already? ...
> Please do test it, though, if you have a network it can be tested on. I
> don't think Canonical has a WPA-EAP network so this will have to rely on
> the users and on the eyes that look at the code.
If i find the time, i'll give it a try tomorrow =)
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 11:21:41PM -0000, Andrew Jorgensen wrote:
[...]
> Also this may be the last case where they weren't stored in the keyring,
> in which case the motivation to write a new infrastructure to prevent it
> goes away.
Can't say I'm a fan of that line of thought. Maybe this should be
reported as a separate security-related bug? - If it isn't already? ...
> Please do test it, though, if you have a network it can be tested on. I
> don't think Canonical has a WPA-EAP network so this will have to rely on
> the users and on the eyes that look at the code.
If i find the time, i'll give it a try tomorrow =)
--
Kind regards,
Morten