Comment 71 for bug 1211110

Revision history for this message
Vincent Gerris (vgerris) wrote :

Since this number comes before the other, if it were a duplicate, it would be the other way around.
While maybe related it is another bug related to ipv6 as far as I can read.

The pile of crap coming from changes in networkmanager, vpn, dnsmasq or wherever they come from is horrible : I have never had so many things breaking over a release and never so vital.

While I am not happy with the content and tend to disagree, please follow the suggestion of post 50. Let's try to be as specific as possible and file the bugs like that. Thank you