Comment 8 for bug 330833

Revision history for this message
Jonathan Ernst (jonathan.ernst) wrote :

@Alexander
Thanks for looking into this ; here are more informations.

Normal route table (with no VPN) :

jernst@jernst-desktop:~$ route -n
Table de routage IP du noyau
Destination Passerelle Genmask Indic Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 1 0 0 eth0
0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0

Route table (with VPN and "ignore obtained routes" checked (you can see that the default gateway has been replaced even if routes should be ignored) :
jernst@jernst-desktop:~$ route -n
Table de routage IP du noyau
Destination Passerelle Genmask Indic Metric Ref Use Iface
10.1.0.21 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 tun0
193.XX.YYY.99 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth0
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 1 0 0 eth0
0.0.0.0 10.1.0.21 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 tun0

Route table (with VPN and "ignore obtained routes" unchecked (the configuration that worked fine before this regression) :
jernst@jernst-desktop:~$ route -n
Table de routage IP du noyau
Destination Passerelle Genmask Indic Metric Ref Use Iface
10.1.0.21 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 tun0
193.XX.YYY.99 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth0
193.XX.YYY.100 10.1.0.21 255.255.255.252 UG 0 0 0 tun0
193.XX.YYY.4 10.1.0.21 255.255.255.252 UG 0 0 0 tun0
193.XX.YYY.104 10.1.0.21 255.255.255.248 UG 0 0 0 tun0
193.XX.YYY.8 10.1.0.21 255.255.255.248 UG 0 0 0 tun0
193.XX.YYY.112 10.1.0.21 255.255.255.240 UG 0 0 0 tun0
193.XX.YYY.128 10.1.0.21 255.255.255.128 UG 0 0 0 tun0
10.0.0.0 10.1.0.21 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 tun0
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 1 0 0 eth0
10.1.0.0 10.1.0.21 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 tun0
10.2.0.0 10.1.0.21 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 tun0
0.0.0.0 10.1.0.21 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 tun0

Requested syslog attached.