I agree that this is a bug. RFCs 1034 and 1035 both are descriptive in saying that the minimum limit of a name is 1. This is confirmed and expounded upon in RFC 2181.
I agree that this is a bug. RFCs 1034 and 1035 both are descriptive in saying that the minimum limit of a name is 1. This is confirmed and expounded upon in RFC 2181.