-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 05:32:39PM -0500, mathew wrote:
>It's stated at
><URL:http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1035455&group_id=8642&atid=358642>
>that the problem is fixed in netatalk 2.0.4.
>
>I note that Debian is distributing 2.0.4 release candidates in testing
>and unstable.
>
>So... at least for Debian testing/unstable, can we now have DHX2
>encryption turned on by default via #defining GNUTLS_DHX please?
DHX2 is enabled in current Debian packaging releases.
DHX still requires OpenSSL, so still cannot be enabled in Debian.
Hope that helps.
- Jonas
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 05:32:39PM -0500, mathew wrote: sourceforge. net/tracker/ index.php? func=detail& aid=1035455& group_id= 8642&atid= 358642>
>It's stated at
><URL:http://
>that the problem is fixed in netatalk 2.0.4.
>
>I note that Debian is distributing 2.0.4 release candidates in testing
>and unstable.
>
>So... at least for Debian testing/unstable, can we now have DHX2
>encryption turned on by default via #defining GNUTLS_DHX please?
DHX2 is enabled in current Debian packaging releases.
DHX still requires OpenSSL, so still cannot be enabled in Debian.
Hope that helps.
- Jonas
- -- dr.jones. dk/
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREDAAYFAko yZUEACgkQn7DbMs AkQLhtVQCfVUvxk aeVCIZRgkVpM1ZD IHPQ wQ90waktY+ LqJ0HP0
3KwAoKFRWPbEOu4
=wLdD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----