AFAIK, .la file claimed to be unnecessary for proper libtool functionality. And more importantly - software shouldn't know about what lib in particular it will be linked - it's libtool job to decide.
Quote:
"libtool functions fine without a
.la file, the need for this file was artificial created by neon-config
having an option to expose the .la filename, which AFAICT applications
never actually needed."
AFAIK, .la file claimed to be unnecessary for proper libtool functionality. And more importantly - software shouldn't know about what lib in particular it will be linked - it's libtool job to decide.
Quote:
"libtool functions fine without a
.la file, the need for this file was artificial created by neon-config
having an option to expose the .la filename, which AFAICT applications
never actually needed."
Main threads discussing this problem: bugs.debian. org/cgi- bin/bugreport. cgi?bug= 386652 - removing .la from neon bugs.debian. org/cgi- bin/bugreport. cgi?bug= 400140 - la file missing bug www.debian. org/doc/ debian- policy/ ch-files. html#s- libraries - lib's policy
Debian:
http://
http://
http://
Subversion: subversion. tigris. org/servlets/ BrowseList? list=dev& by=thread& from=647733 - attempt to fix missing libneon.la subversion. tigris. org/servlets/ BrowseList? list=dev& by=thread& from=659159 - missing libneon.la
http://
http://