nautilus quits unexpected when access file folder in flash disk

Bug #27440 reported by bstqc_ostl on 2005-12-21
12
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
nautilus (Ubuntu)
Medium
Ubuntu Desktop Bugs

Bug Description

1.insert my patriot flash disk to USB port;
2.an icon appeared on desktop;
3.double click any file folder in the flash disk;
4.nautilus quits unexpected

bstqc_ostl (jianggw) wrote :

Created an attachment (id=5418)
screenshot when crash happens

Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

Thanks for your bug. What version of Ubuntu do you use? Could you click on the
"Infor Developers" button of the dialog to get the backtrace of the crash and
copy it to a comment?

bstqc_ostl (jianggw) wrote :
Download full text (10.2 KiB)

(In reply to comment #2)
> Thanks for your bug. What version of Ubuntu do you use? Could you click on the
> "Infor Developers" button of the dialog to get the backtrace of the crash and
> copy it to a comment?

dapper flight2 on dell latitude d600.

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
`system-supplied DSO at 0xffffe000' has disappeared; keeping its symbols.
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1225795904 (LWP 11576)]
[New Thread -1228424272 (LWP 11577)]
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols fo...

Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

Could you get the same backtrace with the libglib2.0-0-dbg nautilus-dbg packages
installed?

bstqc_ostl (jianggw) wrote :

(In reply to comment #4)
> Could you get the same backtrace with the libglib2.0-0-dbg nautilus-dbg packages
> installed?

libglib2.0-0-dbg is installed already,while I don't find nautilus-dbg in synaptic package
manager.Where can I get it?

Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

nautilus-dbg is an universe package

bstqc_ostl (jianggw) wrote :

(In reply to comment #6)
> nautilus-dbg is an universe package

I download nautilus-dbg from http://packages.ubuntu.com/hoary/gnome/nautilus-dbg
the version of nautilus on my system is 2.13.3-ubuntu2
nautilus-dbg depends on nautilus2.10.0-ubuntu9
What should I do next?

Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

The same thing you did for comment #3

Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > nautilus-dbg is an universe package
>
> I download nautilus-dbg from http://packages.ubuntu.com/hoary/gnome/nautilus-dbg
> the version of nautilus on my system is 2.13.3-ubuntu2
> nautilus-dbg depends on nautilus2.10.0-ubuntu9
> What should I do next?

Why no just using universe and apt-get it? Universe is not activated by default
but you can uncomment the line from /etc/apt/sources.list or use the
update-manager/synaptic list of mirrors and select the corresponding line

Daniel Holbach (dholbach) wrote :

Your bug lacks information we would need to investigate further. We
are now going to close the bug - please reopen if you have more
information at hand.

Changed in nautilus:
assignee: seb128 → desktop-bugs
status: Needs Info → Rejected
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.