(In reply to comment #36)
> Remember, spatial Nautilus itself was introduced as a last minute change, was
> opposed by a majority of users and we had to wait 6 month before getting a
> normal possibility to switch it off.
I don't want to argue again about the fact that this change is good or wrong,
but I can't let you say something wrong like "spatial Nautilus itself was
introduced as a last minute change". Spatial nautilus wasn't a last minute
change: it was announced in September 2003
(http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2003-September/msg00446.html),
at the beginning of the development cycle for GNOME 2.6 (see http://gnome.org/start/2.5/ for the GNOME 2.6 schedule) and it had been
discussed since September 2002.
(In reply to comment #36)
> Remember, spatial Nautilus itself was introduced as a last minute change, was
> opposed by a majority of users and we had to wait 6 month before getting a
> normal possibility to switch it off.
I don't want to argue again about the fact that this change is good or wrong, mail.gnome. org/archives/ desktop- devel-list/ 2003-September/ msg00446. html), gnome.org/ start/2. 5/ for the GNOME 2.6 schedule) and it had been
but I can't let you say something wrong like "spatial Nautilus itself was
introduced as a last minute change". Spatial nautilus wasn't a last minute
change: it was announced in September 2003
(http://
at the beginning of the development cycle for GNOME 2.6 (see
http://
discussed since September 2002.