I've been trying to figure out what the implications are for using the "usefree" mount parameter.
Using the drive with some (which? Vista?) versions of Windows doesn't update the filesystem's free_clusters, and Linux's vfat driver doesn't know where the data is now written (if it is at all).
So, if I use the drive with only Linux, and older versions of Windows (which? XP? 2000?), everything will work peachy, but if I use the drive with some version of Windows, the free counts will be incorrect in Linux.
Is this a severe problem? What are the implications if this happens? Can data loss occur, or is there just a chance that incorrect free space will be displayed?
I've been trying to figure out what the implications are for using the "usefree" mount parameter.
Using the drive with some (which? Vista?) versions of Windows doesn't update the filesystem's free_clusters, and Linux's vfat driver doesn't know where the data is now written (if it is at all).
So, if I use the drive with only Linux, and older versions of Windows (which? XP? 2000?), everything will work peachy, but if I use the drive with some version of Windows, the free counts will be incorrect in Linux.
Is this a severe problem? What are the implications if this happens? Can data loss occur, or is there just a chance that incorrect free space will be displayed?