Comment 5 for bug 1595607

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

there are no e.u.c reports from the new version (though the numbers were not that high with the current one so it means not many users are hitting the issue and that it could be that none of the proposed testers hit it yet) nor regressions/new bugs reported and nano seems to work fine, probably good to set as verification-done?