(In reply to Sam Kottler from comment #14)
> Agreed. I do not want to keep the package name the same and change the
> Source0 to point to an upstream of a different name. Splitting the packages
> apart and maintaining them separately; if everyone agrees that is a
> reasonable path forward then I'll start doing the work to get that done in
> rawhide and for EPEL 7. We can also work on getting that done for EPEL 6 and
> Fedora 19/20 if people think it'd be fruitful.
Can I presume that the splitting of the packages entails:
1) Retaining the current spec for "nagios-plugins" so that we may be able to release new versions under the current package name.
2) Using a new package name and spec file for "monitoring-plugins" moving forward.
?
> I hope my comments above provide a reasonable route to resolving this issue.
> What do the two parties involved think?
(In reply to Sam Kottler from comment #14)
> Agreed. I do not want to keep the package name the same and change the
> Source0 to point to an upstream of a different name. Splitting the packages
> apart and maintaining them separately; if everyone agrees that is a
> reasonable path forward then I'll start doing the work to get that done in
> rawhide and for EPEL 7. We can also work on getting that done for EPEL 6 and
> Fedora 19/20 if people think it'd be fruitful.
Can I presume that the splitting of the packages entails:
1) Retaining the current spec for "nagios-plugins" so that we may be able to release new versions under the current package name.
2) Using a new package name and spec file for "monitoring- plugins" moving forward.
?
> I hope my comments above provide a reasonable route to resolving this issue.
> What do the two parties involved think?
As do I. Regards.