On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 09:38:52AM -0000, Tobias Heider wrote:
> I don't think it does, but you have a point. It might be a little safer
> not to touch the function signature. Here's an updated fix.
This isn't quite as easy to read but I do like that the signature is
unchanged. I sure hope upstream takes another stab at these functions, it
feels pretty messy.
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 09:38:52AM -0000, Tobias Heider wrote:
> I don't think it does, but you have a point. It might be a little safer
> not to touch the function signature. Here's an updated fix.
This isn't quite as easy to read but I do like that the signature is
unchanged. I sure hope upstream takes another stab at these functions, it
feels pretty messy.
Thanks