So, the fact that there is not libssl package doesn't constitute a naming problem? My expectation has been that there should be a <package> and matching <package>-dev but that's not the case here unless I'm very mistaken.
So, the fact that there is not libssl package doesn't constitute a naming problem? My expectation has been that there should be a <package> and matching <package>-dev but that's not the case here unless I'm very mistaken.