Comment 4 for bug 1467989

Thanks Mauricio for the answer.
Thanks for clarifying that it was meant as external documentation!
I don't think one wants to backport the newer concurrent code to Trusty, the change would be too unstable for an SRU I'd assume. So for now I'll consider the bug "opinion", that way it can serve as a searchable doc of this issue and a workaround, but it is more clear that it isn't really actionable to "solve" it.

As a suggestion, you might consider also creating an askubuntu.com entry for it as I have seen people heading there first for common "X doesn't work what could I do" cases.