On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 01:44:39AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Note that there is #328123 open against msmtp asking for it to provide
> mail-transport-agent. My current take on this bug is the following: I
> prefer not to touch mutt's Depends line until that bug in msmtp gets
> resolved: if msmtp ends up providing: m-t-a, this bug will be solved,
> and if the maintainer determines msmtp can't provide m-t-a, I will add
> "| msmtp" to mutt's Depend line.
>
> Does this sound reasonable to you? In the meantime, you can use equivs
> to create a dummy mail-transport-agent package.
Oh, I didn't notice that bug - that's perfectly fine with me.
Hi
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 01:44:39AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Note that there is #328123 open against msmtp asking for it to provide agent. My current take on this bug is the following: I agent package.
> mail-transport-
> prefer not to touch mutt's Depends line until that bug in msmtp gets
> resolved: if msmtp ends up providing: m-t-a, this bug will be solved,
> and if the maintainer determines msmtp can't provide m-t-a, I will add
> "| msmtp" to mutt's Depend line.
>
> Does this sound reasonable to you? In the meantime, you can use equivs
> to create a dummy mail-transport-
Oh, I didn't notice that bug - that's perfectly fine with me.
Thanks & Regards www.desire. ch/
Stefan
--
Stefan Ott
http://
"It's because they're stupid, that's why. That's why everybody does
everything." -- Homer Simpson