I can speculate on why the package maintainer has opted for a weaker dependency, but if you would like to see this fixed, forwarding this bug upstream would seem like a reasonable first step.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=mpack;dist=unstable
I can speculate on why the package maintainer has opted for a weaker dependency, but if you would like to see this fixed, forwarding this bug upstream would seem like a reasonable first step.
http:// bugs.debian. org/cgi- bin/pkgreport. cgi?pkg= mpack;dist= unstable