@ Nelson
Yes, that label would be easy to understand and what most people want. On the other hand it would make TB's/SM's behaviour even more unconfigurable. I really think we'll need bug 202148 fixed.
@Boris
There's a bug in our code. I filed bug 394043 with a description.
But why does GSSAPI fail for you in this early stage? I think because do_CreateInstance(NS_AUTH_MODULE_CONTRACTID_PREFIX "sasl-gssapi", &rv) in nsMsgProtocol.cpp#820 fails.
I don't know about the GSSAPI implementation, but might it be that psm isn't compiled in your build?
@ Nelson
Yes, that label would be easy to understand and what most people want. On the other hand it would make TB's/SM's behaviour even more unconfigurable. I really think we'll need bug 202148 fixed.
@Boris ce(NS_AUTH_ MODULE_ CONTRACTID_ PREFIX "sasl-gssapi", &rv) in nsMsgProtocol. cpp#820 fails.
There's a bug in our code. I filed bug 394043 with a description.
But why does GSSAPI fail for you in this early stage? I think because do_CreateInstan
I don't know about the GSSAPI implementation, but might it be that psm isn't compiled in your build?