On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 10:45:07PM -0000, SteveLoughran wrote:
> I appreciate what's being attempted here, gives a good experience for
> those slow, secondary mounts, but I think there are certain partitions
> that you should pause X for, / and /home being the two I have in mind.
> These should be given the bootwait attribute on upgrade.
We *do* block on /home for X.
> Now, I know it was mentioned in the release notes, so you are free to
> dismiss as "told you so", but given that neither machine was coming up
> with X, I wasn't in a position to go through those release notes to see
> what was in there that I should have remembered.
If X isn't coming up, that sounds like the opposite problem: X is still
waiting for /home and /home isn't available. Is that correct?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
<email address hidden> <email address hidden>
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 10:45:07PM -0000, SteveLoughran wrote:
> I appreciate what's being attempted here, gives a good experience for
> those slow, secondary mounts, but I think there are certain partitions
> that you should pause X for, / and /home being the two I have in mind.
> These should be given the bootwait attribute on upgrade.
We *do* block on /home for X.
> Now, I know it was mentioned in the release notes, so you are free to
> dismiss as "told you so", but given that neither machine was coming up
> with X, I wasn't in a position to go through those release notes to see
> what was in there that I should have remembered.
If X isn't coming up, that sounds like the opposite problem: X is still
waiting for /home and /home isn't available. Is that correct?
-- www.debian. org/
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://
<email address hidden> <email address hidden>