Log in / Register
Ubuntu
monodevelop package
Overview
Code
Bugs
Blueprints
Translations
Answers
Bug #59404
Comment #3
Comment 3 for bug 59404
Revision history for this message
Robert Nasiadek (robzon)
wrote
on 2006-09-15
:
#3
I'm totally for it. MonoDevelop is just VERY important to be up-to-date. :]
I'm totally for it. MonoDevelop is just VERY important to be up-to-date. :]
I'm totally for it. MonoDevelop is just VERY important to be up-to-date. :]