If you uncomment the "power_mode = default_power_state;" lines in mg::DefaultDisplayConfigurationPolicy::apply_to(), this bug goes away.
Robert Carr was of the opinion that display configuration policies shouldn't be applied at all for nested servers. Maybe mgn::NestedDisplay::NestedDisplay() shouldn't call apply_to()? Or we should add a new no-op default policy for nested displays.
If you uncomment the "power_mode = default_ power_state; " lines in mg::DefaultDisp layConfiguratio nPolicy: :apply_ to(), this bug goes away.
Robert Carr was of the opinion that display configuration policies shouldn't be applied at all for nested servers. Maybe mgn::NestedDisp lay::NestedDisp lay() shouldn't call apply_to()? Or we should add a new no-op default policy for nested displays.