| 2006-08-19 21:19:47 |
Edm00se |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2006-08-20 01:16:11 |
Mark Reitblatt |
libsdl1.2: status |
Unconfirmed |
Confirmed |
|
| 2006-08-20 01:16:11 |
Mark Reitblatt |
libsdl1.2: importance |
Untriaged |
Medium |
|
| 2006-08-20 01:16:11 |
Mark Reitblatt |
libsdl1.2: statusexplanation |
|
|
|
| 2006-08-20 01:23:52 |
Mark Reitblatt |
bug |
|
|
assigned to glib2.0 (Ubuntu) |
| 2006-08-20 01:24:03 |
Mark Reitblatt |
glib2.0: status |
Unconfirmed |
Needs Info |
|
| 2006-08-20 01:24:03 |
Mark Reitblatt |
glib2.0: importance |
Untriaged |
Medium |
|
| 2006-08-20 01:24:03 |
Mark Reitblatt |
glib2.0: statusexplanation |
|
|
|
| 2006-08-21 11:12:38 |
Paul Sladen |
title |
can't install in dapper |
libsdl1.2-dev has trouble installing in dapper. |
|
| 2006-08-21 11:13:03 |
Paul Sladen |
glib2.0: status |
Needs Info |
Rejected |
|
| 2006-08-21 11:13:10 |
Paul Sladen |
mesa: status |
Confirmed |
Rejected |
|
| 2006-08-21 11:13:20 |
Paul Sladen |
libsdl1.2: status |
Unconfirmed |
Needs Info |
|
| 2006-08-21 11:13:20 |
Paul Sladen |
libsdl1.2: statusexplanation |
|
|
|
| 2006-08-21 11:15:52 |
Paul Sladen |
title |
libsdl1.2-dev has trouble installing in dapper. |
libsdl1.2-dev has trouble installing (dapper) because of libarts-dev dependancy |
|
| 2007-07-07 15:22:22 |
Paul Dufresne |
glib2.0: status |
Invalid |
Confirmed |
|
| 2007-07-07 15:22:22 |
Paul Dufresne |
glib2.0: statusexplanation |
|
Hi! I am a bug triager making a follow up on this bug and make sure it is complete enough for a developer to investigate.
I am reopening on glib2.0 (source package for libglib2.0-dev), as it is this one that 'seems' to have a dependency problem.
I don't understand why it was rejected by Paul Sladen.
I am making it Confirmed on glib2.0 since the info requested have been given, although not from original poster.
Looking on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/ I see that your libglib2.0-dev version 2.10.3-0ubuntu1 have been "released" in pocket
updates (that's the only version to be there). I don't really kows what it means, but this is surely significative.
|
|
| 2007-07-07 15:27:17 |
Paul Dufresne |
libsdl1.2: status |
Incomplete |
Confirmed |
|
| 2007-07-07 15:27:17 |
Paul Dufresne |
libsdl1.2: statusexplanation |
|
Changing from 'Incomplete' to 'Confirmed' on libsdl1.2 too. |
|
| 2007-07-07 22:13:16 |
Sebastien Bacher |
glib2.0: status |
Confirmed |
Invalid |
|
| 2007-07-07 22:13:16 |
Sebastien Bacher |
glib2.0: statusexplanation |
Hi! I am a bug triager making a follow up on this bug and make sure it is complete enough for a developer to investigate.
I am reopening on glib2.0 (source package for libglib2.0-dev), as it is this one that 'seems' to have a dependency problem.
I don't understand why it was rejected by Paul Sladen.
I am making it Confirmed on glib2.0 since the info requested have been given, although not from original poster.
Looking on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/ I see that your libglib2.0-dev version 2.10.3-0ubuntu1 have been "released" in pocket
updates (that's the only version to be there). I don't really kows what it means, but this is surely significative.
|
not a glib2.0 bug |
|
| 2007-07-08 17:45:19 |
Paul Dufresne |
libsdl1.2: status |
Confirmed |
Incomplete |
|
| 2007-07-08 17:45:19 |
Paul Dufresne |
libsdl1.2: statusexplanation |
Changing from 'Incomplete' to 'Confirmed' on libsdl1.2 too. |
|
|
| 2007-07-09 14:43:10 |
Paul Dufresne |
libsdl1.2: status |
Incomplete |
Invalid |
|
| 2007-07-09 14:43:10 |
Paul Dufresne |
libsdl1.2: assignee |
|
dufresnep |
|
| 2007-07-09 14:43:10 |
Paul Dufresne |
libsdl1.2: statusexplanation |
|
Well I am closing the bug then.
Thanks jisk for these infos! |
|
