david@ubuntu-laptop:~$ glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
1061 frames in 5.0 seconds = 212.088 FPS
1409 frames in 5.0 seconds = 281.755 FPS
1400 frames in 5.0 seconds = 279.827 FPS
1382 frames in 5.0 seconds = 276.358 FPS
1389 frames in 5.0 seconds = 277.713 FPS
1333 frames in 5.0 seconds = 266.511 FPS
1429 frames in 5.0 seconds = 285.785 FPS
david@ubuntu-laptop:~$ radeontool --debug
Found card 1002:5975 (30000)
(unknown card)
mapping ctrl region
I can confirm this in Jaunty.
david@ubuntu- laptop: ~$ glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
1061 frames in 5.0 seconds = 212.088 FPS
1409 frames in 5.0 seconds = 281.755 FPS
1400 frames in 5.0 seconds = 279.827 FPS
1382 frames in 5.0 seconds = 276.358 FPS
1389 frames in 5.0 seconds = 277.713 FPS
1333 frames in 5.0 seconds = 266.511 FPS
1429 frames in 5.0 seconds = 285.785 FPS
david@ubuntu- laptop: ~$ radeontool --debug
Found card 1002:5975 (30000)
(unknown card)
mapping ctrl region
david@ubuntu- laptop: ~$ lspci | grep Xpress
01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RS482 [Radeon Xpress 200M]
david@ubuntu- laptop: ~$ uname -a
Linux ubuntu-laptop 2.6.28-11-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 17 01:57:59 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux
This is on an Acer laptop and it is a pretty common card. A fix would likely help many.