Log in / Register
Ubuntu
mesa package
Overview
Code
Bugs
Blueprints
Translations
Answers
Bug #1972977
Comment #13
Comment 13 for bug 1972977
Revision history for this message
Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)
wrote
on 2023-01-04
:
#13
or just skip this and accept the kinetic backport which has the fix via upstream
or just skip this and accept the kinetic backport which has the fix via upstream
or just skip this and accept the kinetic backport which has the fix via upstream