Comment 4 for bug 1019444

Revision history for this message
Bryce Harrington (bryce) wrote :

The -ati box has turned out to be DOA due to a bad motherboard, so I've been unsuccessful getting tests on that.

However, I've posted the nouveau and intel tests here:

  http://people.canonical.com/~bryce/mesa804-piglit/

Note this set of runs uses a newer piglit checkout than my previous runs against mesa 8.0.3.

The Intel results look good, with a number of passed tests increasing by +10 from 6463/6618 to 6473/6618. However, note that there are four tests which regress (see at http://people.canonical.com/~bryce/mesa804-piglit/intel/regressions.html). I'm not certain what to make of that, it's not clear why they failed. Maybe these are unimportant, but I'll follow up on them.

The nouveau results look even better, at +705 passing from 478 to 1183, however note that the low initial number is due to one of the earlier tests triggering a kernel oops (bug #1047710); with the newer mesa, that bug doesn't get tripped but a later test trips a GPU lockup (bug #1050035). So we can say that mesa 8.0.4 improves things significantly, but bugs remain.