Note this set of runs uses a newer piglit checkout than my previous runs against mesa 8.0.3.
The Intel results look good, with a number of passed tests increasing by +10 from 6463/6618 to 6473/6618. However, note that there are four tests which regress (see at http://people.canonical.com/~bryce/mesa804-piglit/intel/regressions.html). I'm not certain what to make of that, it's not clear why they failed. Maybe these are unimportant, but I'll follow up on them.
The nouveau results look even better, at +705 passing from 478 to 1183, however note that the low initial number is due to one of the earlier tests triggering a kernel oops (bug #1047710); with the newer mesa, that bug doesn't get tripped but a later test trips a GPU lockup (bug #1050035). So we can say that mesa 8.0.4 improves things significantly, but bugs remain.
The -ati box has turned out to be DOA due to a bad motherboard, so I've been unsuccessful getting tests on that.
However, I've posted the nouveau and intel tests here:
http:// people. canonical. com/~bryce/ mesa804- piglit/
Note this set of runs uses a newer piglit checkout than my previous runs against mesa 8.0.3.
The Intel results look good, with a number of passed tests increasing by +10 from 6463/6618 to 6473/6618. However, note that there are four tests which regress (see at http:// people. canonical. com/~bryce/ mesa804- piglit/ intel/regressio ns.html). I'm not certain what to make of that, it's not clear why they failed. Maybe these are unimportant, but I'll follow up on them.
The nouveau results look even better, at +705 passing from 478 to 1183, however note that the low initial number is due to one of the earlier tests triggering a kernel oops (bug #1047710); with the newer mesa, that bug doesn't get tripped but a later test trips a GPU lockup (bug #1050035). So we can say that mesa 8.0.4 improves things significantly, but bugs remain.