One question to the patch: You only load the config from
/etc/mdadm/debian.conf. As I understand the
postinst, this file was the old location for storing these
values and /etc/default/mdadm is used now. Shouldn't
mdadm.config try to load both files, prefering
/etc/default/mdadm if both exist?
Message-ID: <20041009124918 .GB4743@ feynman>
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 14:49:19 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <email address hidden>
To: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#274208: patch
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 08:02:39AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: people. ubuntulinux. org/patches/ mdadm.274208. diff
> Hi,
> I prepared and tested a patch to fix this bug that you can find here:
>
> http://
One question to the patch: You only load the config from debian. conf. As I understand the
/etc/mdadm/
postinst, this file was the old location for storing these
values and /etc/default/mdadm is used now. Shouldn't
mdadm.config try to load both files, prefering
/etc/default/mdadm if both exist?
Gruesse, www.djpig. de/
--
Frank Lichtenheld <email address hidden>
www: http://