[->UUIDudev] MD/LVM boot broken

Bug #328892 reported by Bryan Larsen
4
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
mdadm (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: initramfs-tools

This is probably very closely related to bug 314879, but since that is marked as fixed, I'm opening a new one.

I upgraded from Intrepid to Jaunty Alpha5. After the reboot, I got dropped into busybox.

To fix it, I needed the following *4* commands at the initramfs prompt:

mdadm --assemble --scan
lvm vgscan
lvm vgchange -ay
exit

My package versions are:

lvm2 - 2.02.39-0ubuntu6
initramfs-tools - 0.92bubuntu20
mdadm - 2.6.7.1-1ubuntu6
kernel 2.6.28-7-generic

Revision history for this message
Bryan Larsen (bryan-larsen) wrote :

and watershed version 3

Revision history for this message
Yannis Tsop (ogiannhs) wrote :

Same problem here. Cannot boot, even the mentioned solution does not work

Revision history for this message
Bryan Larsen (bryan-larsen) wrote :

The problem has just gotten severely worse. I did a apt-get dist-upgrade today, and am no longer able to boot my machine.

At the (first) busybox prompt I type the above commands.

The computer then pauses for a few minutes and then returns with many messages of the form:

"/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.4/0000:03:00.1/host6/target6:0:0/6:0;);)/block/sdd/sd1 (10437)"

The only thing that changes is the last number. It decreases, but not necessarily by one.

Following is:

"Gave up waiting for root device. Common problems:
  - Boot args (cat /proc/cmdline)
   - Check rootdelay= (did the system wait long enough?)
   - Check root= (did the system wait for the right device?)
  - Missing modules (cat /proc/modules; ls /dev)
ALERT! /dev/mapper/root_vg-root_v does not exist. Dropping to a shell!"

But if I type

mkdir /mnt
mount /dev/mapper/root_vg-root-v /mnt

it succeeds.

Booting from CD can also give me access to the volume. fsck tells me that it's clean.

HELP! I'm dead in the water.

Revision history for this message
Bryan Larsen (bryan-larsen) wrote :

I managed to boot with a 2.6.24 kernel -- both 2.6.27 and 2.6.28 exhibited the same problem. (Well, the 2.6.27 wasn't exactly the same).

However, in 2.6.24, my udevd eats up 80% of my CPU and makes my hard disk churn!

Looking through my ps -ax, it may be the "/lib/udev/watershed sh -c /sbin/lvm vgscan; /sbin/lvm vgchange -a y" that is causing udevd to go crazy. If I kill the "lvm" process, another one gets immediately restarted.

My version numbers are the same as above except for:

initramfs-tools: 0.92bubuntu21
mdadm: 2.6.7.1-1ubuntu7

kernel that booted: 2.6.24-21-generic
kernel that didn't boot: 2.6.28-8.24

Revision history for this message
Bryan Larsen (bryan-larsen) wrote :

Note that I have two md's. The one I don't care about get's started automatically, the mdadm --assemble --scan is only required to start the md that has my root partition.

Revision history for this message
Scott James Remnant (Canonical) (canonical-scott) wrote : Re: [Bug 328892] Re: MD/LVM boot broken

On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 21:53 +0000, Bryan Larsen wrote:

> I managed to boot with a 2.6.24 kernel -- both 2.6.27 and 2.6.28
> exhibited the same problem. (Well, the 2.6.27 wasn't exactly the same).
>
> However, in 2.6.24, my udevd eats up 80% of my CPU and makes my hard
> disk churn!
>
This is bug #332270, for which patches have been uploaded this evening.

Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
<email address hidden>

Revision history for this message
Bryan Larsen (bryan-larsen) wrote : Re: MD/LVM boot broken

Thanks Scott, but udev 138-2 does not fix the second problem, but it does make it different. Since this is quite probably two different bugs, I've opened another report with the details at bug 333614.

Revision history for this message
Scott James Remnant (Canonical) (canonical-scott) wrote : Re: [Bug 328892] Re: MD/LVM boot broken

On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 00:48 +0000, Bryan Larsen wrote:

> Thanks Scott, but udev 138-2 does not fix the second problem, but it
> does make it different. Since this is quite probably two different
> bugs, I've opened another report with the details at bug 333614.
>
Did you also upgrade lvm2?

Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
<email address hidden>

Revision history for this message
Bryan Larsen (bryan-larsen) wrote : Re: MD/LVM boot broken

Thanks for the pointer that there's a new lvm2. Unfortunately, 2.02.39-0ubuntu8 does not affect my problem in any way.

Revision history for this message
Bryan Larsen (bryan-larsen) wrote :

This is not a duplicate of bug 332270 -- the fix for 332270 just fixed comment #3 -- the original problem is still extant.

Revision history for this message
Bryan Larsen (bryan-larsen) wrote :

This is not a duplicate of bug 332270! Would somebody please reopen this bug!

I finally fixed this bug. My upgrade to Jaunty produced the attached bad mdadm.conf. I ran "dpkg-reconfigure mdadm" and it fixed the bug, producing the attached correct mdadm.conf.

Revision history for this message
Bryan Larsen (bryan-larsen) wrote :

This is not a duplicate. The bug appears to be in mdadm.

Revision history for this message
Daniel Hahler (blueyed) wrote :

Diff between bad and good mdadm.conf from the comments above:

--- mdadm.conf.backup 2009-03-14 15:39:56.000000000 +0100
+++ mdadm.conf 2009-03-14 15:41:53.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,5 +1,3 @@
 DEVICE partitions
-ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid5 num-devices=3 UUID=5ab28c4c:2cc90775:9b315729:d7b43017
-DEVICE partitions
-ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid5 num-devices=3 UUID=5ab28c4c:2cc90775:9b315729:d7b43017
+ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid5 num-devices=3 metadata=00.90 UUID=5ab28c4c:2cc90775:9b315729:d7b43017
 MAILADDR <email address hidden>

(Please note that you re-open/un-duplicate bugs yourself, doing so now - and assigning to mdadm accordingly)

Revision history for this message
ceg (ceg) wrote :

This should be no issue with UUID-based raid assembly that makes mdadm.conf ARRAY definition maintanance obsolete.

summary: - MD/LVM boot broken
+ [->UUIDudev] MD/LVM boot broken
Revision history for this message
ceg (ceg) wrote :

UUID-based raid assembly: Bug #158918

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.