Comment 3 for bug 1196295

Revision history for this message
Serge Hallyn (serge-hallyn) wrote : Re: [Bug 1196295] [NEW] lxc-start enters uninterruptible sleep

Quoting Pavel Bennett (<email address hidden>):
> If it matters, I SIGKILL my lxc-start processes instead of using lxc-
> stop. Could that have any negative implications?

Yes, the lxc-start process itself is not the container init, so killing
it will prevent lxc from doing cleanup. Please try to reproduce with
lxc-stop.

 status: incomplete
 importance: high