Comment 13 for bug 1832859

Revision history for this message
Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) wrote :

It seems - somewhat expected - that the solution needs to be a bit bigger due to further service dependencies that might create a loop. Until that solution is sorted out upstream we should not implement another custom emergency fix that might cause more trouble.

Instead while we wait on the final solution by upstream I'd recommend that everybody affected needs to evaluate his own system if the modification suggested in comment #8 would suffice as a workaround for you.