Comment 5 for bug 1527865

Thank you for the debdiff! This looks good to me and I'd be happy to sponsor it, but I'd just like to give Matthias an opportunity to comment first in case it's the wrong thing to do. I've subscribed him to this bug. If Matthias hasn't objected after a while ping me and I'll sponsor.

17:15 <rbasak> LocutusOfBorg1: in your PPA test you disabled both LLDB build and test, but your submitted debdiff only disables test.
17:15 <rbasak> I'm not sure how I feel about this.
17:15 <rbasak> If it works then it's better than a complete FTBFS I suppose.
17:16 <rbasak> But are we shoving something under the carpet that will be a maintenance burden for us later?
17:16 <rbasak> LocutusOfBorg1: let me comment in the bug. If doko doesn't object then I'll sponsor.
17:16 <rbasak> LocutusOfBorg1: in the meantime do you mind confirming in your PPA that disabling just the LLDB test works please?
17:17 <rbasak> Also, is it suitable to build it if it is not being tested? Or if the test is a problem perhaps we _should_ also disable the build?
17:17 -!- doko [~doko@95.91.247.74] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
17:17 <rbasak> I really appreciate your help here. My problem is that I don't know enough about LLVM to be completely confident sponsoring. So let's see what doko thinks.