Created attachment 14868 second attempt to add abi_tag
I came up with a list of various tests and compared the results.. and worked hard to improve the patch :)
http://files.stbuehler.de/test-itanium-mangle.html shows the test results (produced with http://files.stbuehler.de/test-itanium-mangle.sh). Some of the mangling results from gcc could also be considered completely broken (unnecessary emitted tags, missing tags in guard variables).
I fear the performance of the patch might be less than optimal though.
Created attachment 14868
second attempt to add abi_tag
I came up with a list of various tests and compared the results.. and worked hard to improve the patch :)
http:// files.stbuehler .de/test- itanium- mangle. html shows the test results (produced with http:// files.stbuehler .de/test- itanium- mangle. sh). Some of the mangling results from gcc could also be considered completely broken (unnecessary emitted tags, missing tags in guard variables).
I fear the performance of the patch might be less than optimal though.