While I might implement llvm-config on alternatives (patches are welcome), I don't think that doing that for all llvm tools is reasonable.
It is going to be a pain to maintain and hard to use for users.
And, AFAIK, we don't have an equivalent to the port option.
While I might implement llvm-config on alternatives (patches are welcome), I don't think that doing that for all llvm tools is reasonable.
It is going to be a pain to maintain and hard to use for users.
And, AFAIK, we don't have an equivalent to the port option.