Comment 2 for bug 2037099

> * agree subarch name, proposed "x13s"

This is fine.

> * install ubuntu-concept-x13s meta package
[...]

> no signer
> * Auto build.

> -- Launchpad Package Builder <email address hidden> Thu, 21 Sep 2023 11:31:33 +0000

Interesting. So where does this come from? https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-concept/+archive/ubuntu/x13s points to https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-concept/+recipe/ubuntu-concept-x13s which 404s.

> XB-Task: ubuntu-live, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-desktop-minimal

Oh please no. For one thing, we shouldn't need this anymore now that livecd-rootfs calls germinate directly. For another thing, 'ubuntu-live' is not a correct task name that appears anywhere in the archive. And thirdly, these packages shouldn't be injected into the platform-independent tasks.

> Package: ubuntu-concept-x13s

Immediately I notice this uses a completely different structure to what's used on raspberry pi. We should have a think about how to handle platform metapackages consistently in the archive.

Also I have no idea why 'concept' appears in the package name here, it appears to be a reference to the PPA name only and has nothing to do with the hardware platform branding.