I can't tell, but I think this file should give all the info we need...
I has the remote key codes - ALL WORKING AND TESTED.
I would like to stress the fact that this is a more general problem, as
the bug title says! So its not about a stupid Winfast remote, but its a
real need to include in the ubuntu configurations files the most common
hardware, so that most complains wouldnt happen at all.
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 10:41 +0000, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Do the other keys not produce any input event at all (in input-events),
> or are they just >= 256, so that X.org cannot use them?
>
I can't tell, but I think this file should give all the info we need...
I has the remote key codes - ALL WORKING AND TESTED.
I would like to stress the fact that this is a more general problem, as
the bug title says! So its not about a stupid Winfast remote, but its a
real need to include in the ubuntu configurations files the most common
hardware, so that most complains wouldnt happen at all.
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 10:41 +0000, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Do the other keys not produce any input event at all (in input-events),
> or are they just >= 256, so that X.org cannot use them?
>