Comment 3 for bug 960126

Revision history for this message
Stefan Bader (smb) wrote :

Looking at the package data itself, there was not something that immediately sprang the eye. So I hope the kernels at

http://people.canonical.com/~smb/lp960126/

will actually succeed in adding information. The kernel does not crash when loading the modified module but I have not been able to test whether my "clever" scheme of debug messages works...