bhmb,
Just to clarify what I did:
1) Downgraded libsane back to the 1.0.18-3ubuntu1 version
2) Commented SUBSYSTEM!="usb_device", GOTO="libsane_rules_end" as Miguel
suggested (this did improve the situation as the scanner was now
recognized by scanimage -L).
But now... very curious, I found out that I had downloaded (a long time
ago) "kooka" a scanning program from KDE. And guess what.... it works.
Which is curious to me because it says it uses "sane", probably in a
different way that scanimage uses "sane".
Patricio
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 15:02 +0000, bhmb wrote:
> Thank you Miguel,
>
> 1/ You were right concerning the authorisation for scanner, I authorised it (see joined text)
> 2/ I then used the same commands (see joined text) as yesterday and it seems to work well until the last one "scanimage -L" where no scanner is identified (see joined text). It seems this time I am where Fabricio was yesterday.
> 3/ I then used the command you suggested in your answer to Fabricio with no satifactory result (see joined text)
> 4/ I may misunderstand what Fabricio did, but doing the same I keep with "no device found".
> - Did-it improve anything to use the other scanner before ?
> - Is there any scanner pilot compatible with 5300C which could be forced to be used ?
>
>
> ** Attachment added: "Miguel 1"
> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18641031/Miguel%201
>
bhmb, ="usb_device" , GOTO="libsane_ rules_end" as Miguel
Just to clarify what I did:
1) Downgraded libsane back to the 1.0.18-3ubuntu1 version
2) Commented SUBSYSTEM!
suggested (this did improve the situation as the scanner was now
recognized by scanimage -L).
But now... very curious, I found out that I had downloaded (a long time
ago) "kooka" a scanning program from KDE. And guess what.... it works.
Which is curious to me because it says it uses "sane", probably in a
different way that scanimage uses "sane".
Patricio
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 15:02 +0000, bhmb wrote: launchpadlibrar ian.net/ 18641031/ Miguel% 201
> Thank you Miguel,
>
> 1/ You were right concerning the authorisation for scanner, I authorised it (see joined text)
> 2/ I then used the same commands (see joined text) as yesterday and it seems to work well until the last one "scanimage -L" where no scanner is identified (see joined text). It seems this time I am where Fabricio was yesterday.
> 3/ I then used the command you suggested in your answer to Fabricio with no satifactory result (see joined text)
> 4/ I may misunderstand what Fabricio did, but doing the same I keep with "no device found".
> - Did-it improve anything to use the other scanner before ?
> - Is there any scanner pilot compatible with 5300C which could be forced to be used ?
>
>
> ** Attachment added: "Miguel 1"
> http://
>