Ubuntu
linux package

  1. Bug #770679
  2. Comment #14

Comment 14 for bug 770679

Revision history for this message
Robert Nelson (robertcnelson) wrote :

Matt,

Your ID of (011) doesn't make a lot of sense, since that would be the next logical "xM C++" aka "xM D" revision would be.. ;)

Maybe Koen knows something we don't, when he implemented the "omap3: beagle: if rev unknown, assume xM revision C" part of the xM C changeset...

Regards,