I'm trying to construct a list of good and bad commits to use for starting a new bisection run. Please take note that it only takes a single occurrence of the evergreen_cp_resume oops to qualify a commit as bad, so there's no need to continue testing once you've seen that oops.
I do agree that the radeon_gart_unbind oops looks different, so that shouldn't be considered a failure for the purposes of the bisection.
Here's the list I have now.
Bad builds: 000 003 005 006 007 008 009 010 011
Good builds: 001 004
Inconclusive: 005
Martin, just to verify -- with each of the builds you've indicated have failed for you, you've verified that you're getting the evergreen_cp_resume oops?
josejuan05, when you tested build 005, did you verify that you were getting an oops in evergreen_cp_resume? If so, we can move that one to the bad list.
Once this is all sorted out I'll use the information to seed a new bisection and start providing more builds to test.
I'm trying to construct a list of good and bad commits to use for starting a new bisection run. Please take note that it only takes a single occurrence of the evergreen_cp_resume oops to qualify a commit as bad, so there's no need to continue testing once you've seen that oops.
I do agree that the radeon_gart_unbind oops looks different, so that shouldn't be considered a failure for the purposes of the bisection.
Here's the list I have now.
Bad builds: 000 003 005 006 007 008 009 010 011
Good builds: 001 004
Inconclusive: 005
Martin, just to verify -- with each of the builds you've indicated have failed for you, you've verified that you're getting the evergreen_cp_resume oops?
josejuan05, when you tested build 005, did you verify that you were getting an oops in evergreen_ cp_resume? If so, we can move that one to the bad list.
Once this is all sorted out I'll use the information to seed a new bisection and start providing more builds to test.
Thanks everyone!