I did a small test this morning with ami-e4c9388d:
IMAGE ami-e4c9388d 099720109477/ebs/ubuntu-images-testing/ubuntu-natty-daily-amd64-server-20110104 099720109477 available public x86_64 machine aki-427d952b ebs
BLOCKDEVICEMAPPING /dev/sda1 snap-9fb802f2 8
Originally running 2.6.37-11 and showing sda and sdb in /proc/partitions. I did a build from the current master-next in Natty:
# uname -a
Linux ip-10-117-77-50 2.6.37-12-virtual #26~lp684875v1 SMP Wed Jan 5 09:14:12 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
# cat /proc/partitions
major minor #blocks name
202 1 8388608 xvda1
202 16 440366080 xvdb
This works with or without the xen_emul_unplug=unnecesarry switch (expected as m1.large is not HVM). So we seem to be ok with just reverting the patch. Though we should check whether we now need the argument for our cluster instances.
I did a small test this morning with ami-e4c9388d:
IMAGE ami-e4c9388d 099720109477/ ebs/ubuntu- images- testing/ ubuntu- natty-daily- amd64-server- 20110104 099720109477 available public x86_64 machine aki-427d952b ebs
BLOCKDEVICEMAPPING /dev/sda1 snap-9fb802f2 8
Originally running 2.6.37-11 and showing sda and sdb in /proc/partitions. I did a build from the current master-next in Natty:
# uname -a
Linux ip-10-117-77-50 2.6.37-12-virtual #26~lp684875v1 SMP Wed Jan 5 09:14:12 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
# cat /proc/partitions
major minor #blocks name
202 1 8388608 xvda1
202 16 440366080 xvdb
This works with or without the xen_emul_ unplug= unnecesarry switch (expected as m1.large is not HVM). So we seem to be ok with just reverting the patch. Though we should check whether we now need the argument for our cluster instances.