Comment 647 for bug 620074

Revision history for this message
In , loki (loki-linux-kernel-bugs) wrote :

(In reply to devsk from comment #633)
> > So BFQ solved this problem for me. Maybe it's not stable yet,
> > but for me it's more stable than using CFS !!!
>
> BFQ and CFS are not congruent. May be you meant BFS?

Sorry, my mistake. Meant CFQ. But on the other hand BFS, too. BFS did give me some improvements, I could listen to music while I created a big file, but that was all. So CFQ without BFS was a no-go, CFQ with BFS helped a little, but BFQ alone solved my problems which I had for the past 4-5 years, in which I had to bend and improvise to create a VDI of 60 GB and hoping that my computer stays alive until it finishes the job, and mind you a computer that has resources in abundance. :)